Children's topic's
Ear Infections
Children's Ear Infections Soar Despite Medical 'Treatment'
Health Watch, May 1997
Review
Between 1981
and 1988 there was a 44% increase in the number of preschooler
ear infection cases in the United States. In 1988 the figure had
reached 5.9 million, and by 1990 ear infections were the
diagnosis arrived at by medical doctors the second most
frequently. Potentially resulting in hearing loss, many believe
that the medical community needs a new approach to treatment for
ear infections. The Ladies Home Journal expresses this
view: "'A child's ear infection offers a classic example of how
over-treatment with antibiotics can lead to the development of
drug-resistant strains of bacteria. For years, amoxicillin - a
penicillin-like antibiotic - was the standard treatment for
acute otitis media. However, these infections usually clear,
without treatment, in two or three days...Because amoxicillin
has been so over prescribed, some ear infections that in the
past might have responded to it no longer do. As a result,
doctors are forced to prescribe one after another of stronger -
and more expensive - medications. Furthermore, the stronger
antibiotics are the broad-spectrum ones, which kill the
so-called good bacteria as as well as the bad, making children
vulnerable to secondary infections.'"
Dr. Lehnert concluded form his study on the
role of antibiotic therapy in cases of Otitis Media that
antibiotics really only need to be administered in 5 to 10
percent of cases. Another available and overly popular treatment
is the insertion of tympanotomy tubes into the ear. Though this
procedure was used over 670,000 times in 1988, there is evidence
that 25% of
them should not have been performed, especially not when you
consider the hearing loss and permanent scarring that may result
from the procedure (which has not been found more effective than
medicine or other therapy).
So what are parents doing in light of all
this? They are focusing on Natural Health Care, on behavior
modification, and on diet to help their children use their own
bodies and body resources to stay well.
Vaccines
What are the
risks of vaccines?
Dr. Robert Mendelsohnnn is author of
Confessions of a Medical Heretic and past head of the
Illinois State Board of Licensing for physicians. In the
newsletter The People’s Doctor, Vol.2. No. 4, be wrote:
"
With some immunizations, the risk of taking the shots may
outweigh their benefits. In 1976, while addressing science
writers at a seminar of the American Cancer Society, Dr. Arobert
Simpson of Rutgers University pointed out that "immunization
programs against the flu, measles, mumps, polio, etc. actually
may be seeding humans with RNA to from pro-viruses which will
then become latent cells throughout the body Some of these
latent pro-viruses could cause a variety of diseases including
rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosus,
Parkinson’s disease and perhaps cancer."
Smallpox: The U.S. finally has abandoned
smallpox immunization because the risk of serious complications,
leading to death in one per million vaccinations, was higher
from the vaccine that from the risk of smallpox itself. The
risks of a person being hospitalized with encephalitis or with
conditions known as eczema vaccinatum and progressive vaccinia
were about 10 per million vaccinations.
Diphtheria: This form of immunization often
is of questionable value. For example, during a 1969 outbreak of
diphtheria in Chicago, four of the 16 victims (according to a
Chicago Board of Health Report) had been fully immunized against
the disease, and five others had received one or more doses of
the vaccine. In another report of three fatal diphtheria cases,
one individual who dies and 14 of the 23 carriers had been fully
immunized.
Whopping Cough: Whopping cough (pertussis)
vaccine is hotly debated, both because of its
effectiveness rate is only about 50% and because it may cause
high fevers and convulsions as well as encephalopathy (brain
damage). This vaccine is regarded as so dangerous that most
public health authorities prohibit its use after age six.
Meanwhile, whooping cough itself has almost completely
disappeared (less than 1000 reported cases in 1976).
Measles: Contrary to popular belief,
measles cannot cause blindness; it can cause a condition known
as phtotophbia which parents years ago treated by simply pulling
down the window shades.
Measles vaccine is designed primarily to
prevent measles encephalitis, which is said to occur in one out
of 1000 cases of measles. Any of us who had decades of
experience with measles must question this statistic: the
incidence of 1/1000 may be accurate for children who live in
conditions of poverty and malnutrition, but if one excluded
simple sleepiness from the measles itself, the incidence of true
encephalitis probably is more like 1/10,000 or 1/100,0000.
Meanwhile, the vaccine itself is associated
with encephalopathy in one per million and with a series of
other complications such as SSPE (subacute sclerosing
panencephaliitis). Other neurological and sometimes fatal
conditions associated with the measles vaccine include ataxia,
retardation, learning disability or hyperactivity, aseptic
meningitis, seizure disorders and hemiparesis. I wonder whether
the current epidemic of hyperactivity in children may have its
origin, at least in part, in the measles vaccines
Mandated
Childhood Vaccines
Today, when
parents take their child to a doctor’s office, they are facing a
difficult and sometimes terrifying decision about whether or not
to vaccinate their healthy child. Vaccines are supposed to
protect against one or more of the seven contagious childhood
diseases. As parents become more educated about the risks and
benefits of disease and vaccines, they realize the decision is
not easy.
The American Medical Association (AMA) and
the American Academy of Pediatric (AAP) consider serious adverse
vaccine events to be rare. If a reaction does occur in a healthy
child, many doctors suggest the event was due to an underlying
condition within the child and not as a reaction to the vaccine
or combination of vaccines. Parents must become educated and
make an informed decision. Immunizations are very serious.
Some health professionals warn parents
about a slight fever and crankiness, but not prolonged high
pitch screaming, excessive sleepiness, seizure activity, shock
collapse, etc. that can cause permanent damage and death. These
latter conditions are a sample of acknowledged vaccine reactions
in The National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, PL 99-660.
Under some circumstances, adults may also be required to receive
immunizations. Adverse reactions have been reported and
confirmed, but little study has been dome and the true extent of
adult vaccine reactions is uncertain.
As parents become educated, they realize
there are specific contraindications in which a child should not
receive a particular vaccine at all, and this could help prevent
the child from
becoming a vaccine injury statistic. Before entering their
health care professional’s office, a parent should prepare the
facts for discussion and ask the doctor, "What is the most
serious thing I should be aware of that can happen to my child
from this shot?". A full family medical history should be taken
my the doctor, and if a parent does decide to vaccinate at that
time, their child should be healthy. Consideration should be
given to only administering one shot at a time.
The most complete source about warnings,
side effects, and vaccine schedules (which vaccines should be
given when and it what combination) is the package insert for
each vaccine. This information is compiled by the manufacturer
under the supervision of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The same information is available in the Physicians Desk
Reference (PDR), universally available in libraries, doctor’s
offices and pharmacies. Be sure to compare any other information
you might be given about vaccines to this reference.
Depending on which shot is given, reactions
may begin immediately or up to several weeks or months later.
Parents should observe their child closely for any unusual
behavior or reaction during this time period. If a reaction is
suspected, keep a diary of observations and contacts with your
doctor. Parents should insist their doctor or hospital emergency
room see their child and help their child if they have concerns.
In addition, make sure the doctor enters the vaccine
manufacturer and lot number in the child’s permanent medical
record and the event is reported to the Centers for Disease.
DPT
(diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough ) tetanus), MMR (
measles, mumps and rubella (German Measles)), and polio are
vaccines mandated in many states and covered under PL 99-660 in
a no-fault compensation system. The pertussis (whooping cough)
vaccine has been the most controversial of all vaccines and the
majority of awards in the compensation system have been for
pertussis vaccine injury and death. IF a parent feels a child
has been permanently injured or died from a vaccine, there must
be proof the child was damaged by the vaccine and not from a
pre-existing condition in order to receive compensation. HIB is
not a vaccine included in the compensation system.
States which do not require vaccination
against pertussis for pre-requisite to school entry include AZ,
MO, OR, PA, RI, WA, TX and ID. All fifty states require
diphtheria, measles, rubella, and polio vaccination. All states
except AZ, MO and NY require tetanus vaccination and all states
except AK, AZ, AR, IA, KY, MD, MO, NM, SC, VT and WV require
mumps vaccination. All states except MS and WV allow a religious
exemption to vaccination. Philosophical objection too
vaccination is allowed in AZ, CA, CO, ID, IN, LA, ME, MI, MN,
MO, NE, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, UT, VT, WA, and WI.
A Shot in the Dark by Harris
Coulter and Barbara Loe Ficsher, is an excellent source of
information about the pertussis vaccine. This book, now in its
second edition, is available through the NVIC/DPT. The NVIC/DPT
also offers a wide range of educational materials, including
copies of the PDR free for members upon request and the NVIC/DPT
Resource List for further study. Whooping Cough, the DPT
Vaccine and Reducing Vaccine Reactions is available for $5
and A Shot in the Dark is available for $13 (VA residents
add 45 cents state tax).
Although most children do not suffer
serious problems from the vaccinations, when it happens to your
child, the risks are 100%.
Dr. Lehnert concluded form his study on the
role of antibiotic therapy in cases of Otitis Media that
antibiotics really only need to be administered in 5 to 10
percent of cases. Another
available and overly popular treatment is the insertion of
tympanotomy tubes into the ear. Though this procedure was used
over 670,000 times in 1988, there is evidence that 25% of them
should not have been performed, especially not when you consider
the hearing loss and permanent scarring that may result from the
procedure (which has not been found more effective than medicine
or other therapy).
So what are parents doing in light of all
this? They are focusing on Natural Health Care, on behavior
modification, and on diet to help their children use their own
bodies and body resources to stay well.
Antibiotics
Survey Shows Link between
Antibiotics and Developmental Delays in Children
International Chiropractic Pediatric Association Newsletter
July 1996
A new nationwide survey of
nearly 700 children is showing a disturbing link between
children with developmental delays and the amount of antibiotics
they have taken,
The survey,
which included youngsters between the ages of one year an 12
years found that those who have taken more than 20 cycles of
antibiotics in their lifetime are over 50% more likely to suffer
developmental delays. Children who have had three of fewer
rounds of antibiotics were half as likely to become
developmentally delayed.
The 9 month survey began in
June 1994 by the Developmental delay Registry, a multi-national
database of 800 families, most of whom who have children with
developmental delays.
The survey's other findings:
Nearly 75% of the delayed children were reported to be
developing normally in their first year of life
Developmentally delayed children were 37% more likely to have
had 3 or more ear infections than unaffected children
Affected children were nearly four times as likely to have had
negative reactions to immunizations
Affected children were twice as likely to have had ear tubes
than unaffected children
Kelly Dorfman, a licensed nutritionist and co-founder of the
Developmental Delay Registry cautions, "Parents should be put on
notice that utilizing antibiotics prophylactically could
jeopardize their children's development. We believe alternative
approaches to treating ear infections should be considered."
The incidence of children in
the United States with developmental, behavioral, and mental
disorders is dramatically increasing. Conservative estimates
show that in the last four years
the number of children under the age of 18 with these disorders
has grown from 4.8 million to 7.5 million. Included in these
pervasive developmental disorders are autism, speech and
language problems and multi-system developmental disorders.
Symptoms range from skin irritations and sleep disorders to
repetitive behavior and loss of language.
The ICPA for a number of
years has talked about the abuse of antibiotics. This is another
study which verifies our concerns.
A majority of the above
article was reprinted from the publications of the Developmental
Delay Registry.
Overuse of Antibiotics real
threat
By Doug Levy
USA TODAY 4/28/94
"Crazy" overuse of
antibiotics is one reason drug-resistant diseases such as TB,
staph and pneumonia is on the rise, say experts in today's
New England Journal of Medicine.
Taking
antibiotics "is not like taking an aspirin", says lead author
Alexander Tomasz, Rockefeller University microbiology professor.
"There's vast overuse", he
says, "It's completely crazy."
Among germs resisting
conventional treatments:
Streptococcus pneumonia, which causes pneumonia, meningitis,
otitis media and about 40,000 deaths a year.
Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecium, leading causes
of in-hospital infections; drug-resistant strains now account
for about 1 million infections a year.
Drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis has surfaced in 35
states since 1985.
Another problem: use of
antibiotics in the food chain - to stop diseases among cattle,
fish or other animals - enables germs to build resistance.
Though it may keep both
animals and humans from getting sick now, it raises the risk
that bacteria will develop antibiotic-resistant genes, says
Tomasz.
Over time,"the resistant
gene shows up where it can cause trouble," he says.
The experts call for:
Better infection control in hospitals
Increased monitoring
More Research toward new medications
But "hand in hand with
meticulous infection control must go reductions in the
inappropriate use of antibiotics," says Dr. Barbara Murray,
University of Texas Medical School.
Worldwide health
implications of the problem are the topic at a meeting this week
in Prague, the Czech Republic.
Over the
Counter Drugs
Parents
give Kids useless, risky drugs
By Tim Friend
USA TODAY 10/5/94
Parents
often give over-the-counter drugs to preschool children to treat
colds, despite the potential for harm and little proof that the
drugs are effective.
A survey of 8,145
mothers of 3-year olds found 53.7% of the kids had been given an
OTC drug in the previous 30 days, mostly cold medicine and
Tylenol, says Michael Kogan of the National Center for Health
Statistics. In today's Journal of the American Medical
Association:
70% of children with a
recent illness got OTC drugs
Half of kids had been given two types of drugs
White, married, educated mothers with good incomes were most
likely to give drugs
FDA's Dr. Michael Weintraub
says side effects are generally not serious, but there is
potential for adverse reactions and over sedation.
Parents feel
the need to do something for a sick child and in the process
"become easy prey to......promotion by drug companies'" says Dr.
Anne Gadomski of the University of Maryland, in an editorial in
the same issue.
From 1985-89, 670,000
reports were made to poison control centers involving
over-the-counter drugs and children under age 6.
The truth, she says, is
preschool kids experience 4 to 8 upper respiratory tract
infections a year that are caused by viruses, and there is no
cure for these infections. They commonly go away by themselves
in 5 to 7 days.
Attention
Deficit Disorder
The Dangers of Ritalin
by Linda Rhodes
International Chiropractic Pediatric
Association Newsletter September 1993
Do you know a child who is
easily distracted by outside stimuli? What about a c child who
blurts out answers to unfinished questions or talks excessively?
How about one that fidgets or squirms in his seat? If so, that
child may be diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder
(ADHD) and be prescribed a dangerous drug called Ritalin.
ADHD is a so-called
"illness" described in the Diagnosis and Statistical Manula of
Mental
Disorders 111-R (DSM 111-R) , the handbook of psychiatry. The
"symptoms" described in the DSM-111-R include common forms of
childhood activities such as those described above, failing o
finish chores, and difficulty waiting turns in games (APA 1987).
Ritalin, an amphetamine or "speed-lie" drug, is prescribed to
"treat" ADHD in children and adults. However, when this drug is
prescribed most of the data given to parents about Ritalin is
not true. Statements like "Ritalin has no side effects",
"Ritalin is not at all addictive", and "Ritalin will help
improve your child's performance in school" simply are not true.
Ritalin has many dangerous side effects and withdrawal symptoms,
it is a highly addictive substance often accompanied by crime,
and, statistically, has not been shown to improve the literacy
of schoolchildren.
The manufacturer of Ritalin,
CIBA-GEIGY, warns that the drug must not be used on children
under the age of six. The long term effects of Ritalin have not
been established and the mechanism of how Ritalin have not been
established and the mechanism of how Ritalin works in the body
is not understood. There are also many other warnings that
should be known about the side effects of Ritalin. Among these
are stunting growth, depression, insomnia, nervousness, skin
rash, anorexia, nausea, dizziness, headache, abdominal pain,
blood pressure, and pulse change, and development of Tourette's
syndrome. Tourette's syndrome is a permanent and irreversible
condition characterized by body ticks, spasms, barking sounds,
and screaming obscenities. Chronic usage of Ritalin is also
known to produce psychosis
In addition to dangerous side effects and withdrawal symptoms,
Ritalin is an extremely addictive substance. Under Federal and
Georgia laws, Ritalin is classified as a Schedule 11 Controlled
Substance. This rating of Schedule 11 is given to prescription
drugs which have the greatest abuse and dependence potential.
Other drugs which share this category with Ritalin are morphine,
opium, methadone and cocaine. In fact, the DSM-111-R states that
"the patterns of use, associated features, and course of
Amphetamine Dependence and Abuse are very similar to those of
Cocaine Dependence and Abuse." The DSM-111-R goes on to state
that experience users of amphetamines and cocaine are unable to
distinguish between the two substances. The DSM-111-R continues,
"One of the few differences between the two classes of
substances is that the psychoactive effects of the amphetamine
last longer." Psychiatrists as well as the United States
government recognize that Ritalin is an extremely addictive
substance, although this is a fact rarely known by parents or
users of Ritalin. In a 1988 article titled "Rx Drug Abusers
Targeted", the Akron Beacon Journal stated that Ritalin
accounted for 80% of drug prescription abuse cases in that area.
Reports by law officers in numerous cities across Canada
recognized that Ritalin was responsible for more street crime
than any other drug in a 1987 article in the Western Report. The
article also noted that Ritalin was the street drug of choice
all across Canada (Whyte, Gallagher, etc. 1987).
One would think
that despite all the harmful side effects, withdrawal symptoms
and addictive effects Ritalin would, in fact, help children to
perform better in school. However, this has not shown to be
true. Despite the drastic increase in Ritalin administration to
schoolchildren since its introduction, SAT scores in the United
States have dropped rather than increased over the past thirty
years. Since 1963, SAT scores steadily declined for sixteen
straight years, finally leveling off in the range of 890-900.
The former average SAT score in 1963 was a 980 (Citizens
Commission on Human Rights, 1993). Ritalin, which is currently
administered to thousands of schoolchildren, supposedly improves
he performance of schoolchildren. However, the decline of SAT
scores and study upon study demonstrate the opposite.
No child deserves to be drugged in order to
make them conform to someone else's idea of what it is to be
"good"; to sit still, to await his/her turn in games, etc. No
child deserves to be placed on a drug with such dangerous side
effects as Tourette's syndrome and withdrawal symptoms of
paranoia and suicide. There are alternatives to the behavior
modifying drugging which is occurring to children all across
this country. Many successful non-medicinal alternatives to
Ritalin exist today. For further information on Ritalin or
alternative solutions for handling children diagnosed with ADHD,
contact the Citizens Commission on Human Rights at one of the
following addresses: 6362 Hollywood Blvd. Suite b, Los Angeles,
CA 90028; 1-800-869-CCHR or P.O. Box 1561, Snellville, GA 30278
1-404-518-8868.
Pregnancy
Chiropractic in the 9th
Month of Pregnancy
The 9th Month. William Sears, MD,
Martha Sears, RN. Parenting, June/July 1997.
"As your baby descends into your
pelvic cavity, you may feel sharp, stabbing pains at the
base of your spine or in the middle of your pelvic bone, making
it uncomfortable twinges of "pains and needles" in the cervix
itself. Pain may radiate down your back or thighs. The increased
pelvic aches and pains are likely due to the relaxation and
stretching of your pelvic ligaments in preparation for labor.
You can ease these discomforts by changing positions. Exercise
gently each day; take long, slow walks or ride a stationary
bike. If you cannot exercise without pain, consult your doctor.
He or she may be able to recommend a chiropractor experienced in
working on pregnant bodies, who may be able to give you some
gentle pelvic adjustments to get your hips back in the balance.
It is our personal theory that chiropractic care in pregnancy
can held to avoid or relive back pain and also prepare your back
and pelvic structures for the stresses of labor and delivery.
The 9th Month. William Sears,
MD, Martha Sears, RN. Parenting, June/July 1997.
Caesarean Under Fire
Researchers report that half of all
C-section deliveries needlessly risk the mother’s life or health
without benefit to the baby.
Today the
C-section rate averages one in four births, and at some
hospitals the C-section rate is above 50 percent. Studies
indicate that the babies fare just as well in areas where the
rate is below 20 percent as they do in areas where the rate is
higher.
An analysis published in the Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology revealed that 36 percent of C-sections
are now done because the woman had a previous caesarean. As many
as 95 percent of the women who have had a C-section and are
having another child have a second C-section, despite studies
that have shown at least half could safely deliver vaginally.
C-section is major surgery that places the
mother at 2-4 times the risk of dying in childbirth than if she
delivers vaginally. Most likely complications included infection
(which occurs in 40-70 percent of C-sections), hemorrhage, blood
clots, and injury to the bladder or intestines. The baby can
also be endangered by a C-section scheduled in advance of labor
because mistakes are commonly made about the due date, which
often results in the delivery of a premature baby. Preliminary
studies also suggest that babies delivered by C-section may miss
the action of certain hormones and other substances released
during labor that help prepare the baby for life outside the
womb.
For the optimum delivery it is wise for the
expectant mother to be under Chiropractic care during the
pregnancy. This allows the structures to be in alignment so that
the baby can be delivered naturally.
Is an Epidural Bad for a
Newborn?
Parenting Magazine, August 1997
An epidural can turn a terrible
labor into a tolerable one. Yet a new study suggests this
procedure (numbing the area from the waist down enough to
alleviate pain but not interfere with pushing) may not be
without drawbacks. It’s not that epidurals harm the baby but
simply that some women who have them develop a fever during
delivery, which signals that their newborns may be ill. After
undergoing `testing and treatment, however, the majority of such
infants turn out to be infection free.
Researchers at Boston’s Brigham ad Women’s Hospital studied the
medical records of more
than 1,600 women who had uncomplicated, normal childbirths.
Among the findings: 15 percent of those who had epidurals
developed a fever, raising a red flag about their infants’
health; only 1 percent of new moms who had other forms of pain
relief or none at all had fevers.
Newborns with infections rarely develop obvious symptoms (such
as a temperature rise), so maternal fever is one of the few
signs that a newborn may be ill. And an infection that’s
harmless to a new mom, if untreated, can be fatal to her
newborn. Some doctors, erring on the side of caution, draw blood
from these babies for testing and give them shots of
antibiotics, which often prolongs their hospital stay up to
three days -–only to find that most are perfectly healthy. In
the study, 86 percent of the babies who were tested for
infection and 87 percent of those who received antibiotics were
born to moms who had epidurals. But of those tested less than 1
percent were actually ill.
This puts expectant moms in a quandary;
whether to go for the Epidural or to pass on the one pain
alleviator that will allow them to experience the ecstasy of
childbirth without the agony. Experts caution against forgoing a
n epidural solely for this reason, however, because a new mom’s
temperature may rise even without it. "if a woman labors in a
heated birthing room for many hours, the physical effort alone
may result in a slight fever," "says David Birnbach, M.D.,
director of obstetric anesthesiology at St. Luke’s – Roosevelt
Hospital in New York.
Besides, experts agree that epidurals are
the best labor-pain relief available. So that expectant women
won’t have to factor in the possibility of a fever when
considering an epidural, researchers hope to find ways other
that a mother’s temperature to determine whether a newborn has
an infection.
Meanwhile, if you’re expecting, your doctor
should go over all the pros and cons of having an epidural so
that when the time comes you’ll be prepared to make the choice
that is best for you.
Chiropractics
for Kids
The TAB, May 19, 1992
A Review
Mistakenly believed to be merely "'back
doctors'" for adults, chiropractors have always realized the
benefit children receive from chiropractic care. The spine is
the container for the entire nervous system, the system that
controls functioning for the entire body. Any obstacles (called
vertebral subluxations) to a free flow of energy along those
nerves would interrupt normal, healthy, body function.
Though
chiropractic does not treat specific symptoms, the improved
immune system function that results in Children is effective
against ear infections, allergies, asthma, and bed-wetting that
emerged when a subluxation interrupted communication between the
brain and the body .
These pediatric chiropractors are trained
to adjust children, even shortly after birth, such that it may
take only one, two, or three adjustments to remove subluxations
and dramatically affect the future Health of the child.
Is there more information about
Pediatric Chiropractic Care?
For more information, please visit the
International Chiropractic
Pediatric Association. |